Skip to content
AffordMap
COL-adjusted ranking

Best Cities for Conservation Scientists by Take-Home Pay

The cities that pay Conservation Scientists the most on paper aren't usually the best deals once rent and prices are factored in. Salt Lake City-Murray ranks first with a COL-adjusted equivalent of $92,664/year, better purchasing power than Washington-Arlington-Alexandria's higher nominal pay of $99,360. The table below uses BLS OEWS May 2025 salary data and BEA Regional Price Parities.

Highest nominal pay

#1 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria$99,360
#2 San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont$97,810
#3 Salt Lake City-Murray$93,470

Best purchasing power

#1 Salt Lake City-Murray$92,664
#2 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria$91,256
#3 Madison$87,481

Top 25 metros by purchasing power

Ranked by COL-adjusted salary. Metros with fewer than 100 employed conservation scientists excluded.

Rank
Metro
Nominal
COL-adj.
#1
Salt Lake City-Murray
16% rent burden
$93,470
$92,664
#2
$99,360
$91,256
#3
Madison
16% rent burden
$85,110
$87,481
#4
$97,810
$84,603
#5
$76,540
$83,468
#6
Bend
26% rent burden
$82,630
$79,751
#7
$83,580
$79,283
#8
$78,440
$77,008
#9
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
30% rent burden
$78,460
$75,682
#10
$77,860
$74,514
#11
$82,380
$74,129
#12
$78,980
$74,041
#13
$78,580
$72,578
#14
Anchorage
22% rent burden
$76,430
$72,500
#15
$75,090
$71,637
#16
$75,900
$71,308
#17
Lansing-East Lansing
23% rent burden
$67,580
$71,144
#18
Akron
23% rent burden
$66,420
$71,136
#19
$68,620
$69,970
#20
$78,200
$69,890
#21
$66,120
$69,806
#22
$69,380
$69,338
#23
Columbus
26% rent burden
$66,110
$69,247
#24
Milwaukee-Waukesha
24% rent burden
$66,680
$68,785
#25
$65,280
$68,213

COL-adjusted = nominal salary divided by (BEA RPP divided by 100). Rent burden = annual 2BR FMR as % of nominal salary. Sources: BLS OEWS May 2025, BEA Regional Price Parities, HUD Fair Market Rents.

Common questions

What does "COL-adjusted pay" mean for Conservation Scientists?

COL-adjusted pay divides the BLS median salary by the BEA Regional Price Parity index (100 = national average). A salary of $99,360 in a city with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as $82,800 at national average prices.

Why doesn't New York or San Francisco top this list?

Both cities pay above-average salaries, but rent and everyday costs eat most of that premium. A conservation scientists in New York might earn 30% more but pay 60-80% more in rent. The net result is often less purchasing power than mid-cost metros.

How is purchasing power calculated?

Purchasing power equals nominal median salary divided by (BEA RPP divided by 100). BEA's Regional Price Parities measure relative price levels across metro areas, updated annually from the National Income and Product Accounts.

What's the most affordable metro for Conservation Scientists?

Salt Lake City-Murray has one of the lowest rent burdens for Conservation Scientists in this dataset. HUD FMR for a 2-bedroom is $1,241/month, with a median salary of $93,470.

Where do Conservation Scientists get paid the most in nominal terms?

Washington-Arlington-Alexandria pays the highest nominal median salary at $99,360/year, per BLS OEWS May 2025. But check the COL-adjusted column before accepting any relocation offer.

National salary breakdown for Conservation ScientistsView →How to become a conservation scientistsGuide →Compare two cities side by sideCompare →