Skip to content
AffordMap
COL-adjusted ranking

Best Cities for Forest and Conservation Technicians by Take-Home Pay

The cities that pay Forest and Conservation Technicians the most on paper aren't usually the best deals once rent and prices are factored in. Carson City ranks first with a COL-adjusted equivalent of $68,318/year, better purchasing power than Carson City's higher nominal pay of $67,040. San Francisco and New York dominate the headline salary lists for most occupations, but they don't crack the COL-adjusted top 10 here. The table below uses BLS OEWS May 2025 salary data and BEA Regional Price Parities.

Highest nominal pay

#1 Carson City$67,040
#2 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria$66,930
#3 Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler$65,690

Best purchasing power

#1 Carson City$68,318
#2 Milwaukee-Waukesha$65,298
#3 Rapid City$64,670

Top 25 metros by purchasing power

Ranked by COL-adjusted salary. Metros with fewer than 100 employed forest and conservation technicians excluded.

Rank
Metro
Nominal
COL-adj.
#1
Carson City
28% rent burden
$67,040
$68,318
#2
Milwaukee-Waukesha
25% rent burden
$63,300
$65,298
#3
Rapid City
28% rent burden
$57,660
$64,670
#4
Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler
34% rent burden
$65,690
$63,579
#5
$64,440
$61,477
#6
$66,930
$61,471
#7
Missoula
28% rent burden
$58,990
$61,168
#8
Albuquerque
30% rent burden
$57,700
$60,387
#9
$63,150
$59,329
#10
$59,030
$58,900
#11
Boise City
34% rent burden
$57,660
$58,604
#12
Billings
32% rent burden
$53,290
$56,976
#13
Bend
36% rent burden
$58,990
$56,935
#14
Helena
31% rent burden
$54,160
$56,611
#15
$59,610
$56,545
#16
Coeur d'Alene
33% rent burden
$55,470
$56,435
#17
$61,110
$56,167
#18
$61,880
$55,304
#19
$54,160
$55,125
#20
Salinas
54% rent burden
$59,920
$54,952
#21
$62,400
$53,975
#22
$61,110
$53,808
#23
Medford
34% rent burden
$54,160
$53,396
#24
$52,280
$53,309
#25
Visalia
34% rent burden
$52,690
$52,780

COL-adjusted = nominal salary divided by (BEA RPP divided by 100). Rent burden = annual 2BR FMR as % of nominal salary. Sources: BLS OEWS May 2025, BEA Regional Price Parities, HUD Fair Market Rents.

Common questions

What does "COL-adjusted pay" mean for Forest and Conservation Technicians?

COL-adjusted pay divides the BLS median salary by the BEA Regional Price Parity index (100 = national average). A salary of $67,040 in a city with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as $55,867 at national average prices.

Why doesn't New York or San Francisco top this list?

Both cities pay above-average salaries, but rent and everyday costs eat most of that premium. A forest and conservation technicians in New York might earn 30% more but pay 60-80% more in rent. The net result is often less purchasing power than mid-cost metros.

How is purchasing power calculated?

Purchasing power equals nominal median salary divided by (BEA RPP divided by 100). BEA's Regional Price Parities measure relative price levels across metro areas, updated annually from the National Income and Product Accounts.

What's the most affordable metro for Forest and Conservation Technicians?

Milwaukee-Waukesha has one of the lowest rent burdens for Forest and Conservation Technicians in this dataset. HUD FMR for a 2-bedroom is $1,338/month, with a median salary of $63,300.

Where do Forest and Conservation Technicians get paid the most in nominal terms?

Carson City pays the highest nominal median salary at $67,040/year, per BLS OEWS May 2025. But check the COL-adjusted column before accepting any relocation offer.

National salary breakdown for Forest and Conservation TechniciansView →How to become a forest and conservation techniciansGuide →Compare two cities side by sideCompare →