Human Resources Managers vs. Financial Managers: Who Earns More?
Financial Managerss out-earn Human Resources Managerss by $17K a year at the national median, per BLS OEWS May 2025. Human Resources Managerss land at $149,280 and Financial Managerss at $166,570. The education gap is real: human resources manager programs typically require bachelor's degree, while financial manager programs require bachelor's degree. Top-paying state for Human Resources Managerss is District of Columbia ($184,350); for Financial Managerss it's New York ($219,880).
Pay by state
States where both occupations have BLS data, sorted by Human Resources Managers median pay.
Source: BLS OEWS May 2025. Highlighted value is higher in each row.
Common questions
Who earns more, Human Resources Managerss or Financial Managerss?
Financial Managerss earn more nationally. The median is $149,280 for Human Resources Managerss versus $166,570 for Financial Managerss, a difference of $17K. Per BLS OEWS May 2025.
Which has better job growth, Human Resources Managers or Financial Managers?
BLS Employment Projections data is not available for one or both occupations. Check the individual career pages for current outlook figures.
Which requires more education, Human Resources Managers or Financial Managers?
Human Resources Managers typically requires bachelor's degree. Financial Managers requires bachelor's degree. Education requirements vary by employer and state licensing board.
Where do Human Resources Managerss get paid the most?
District of Columbia is the top-paying state for Human Resources Managerss at $184,350/year, per BLS OEWS May 2025. Major metro areas within that state typically pay even more than the state average.
How does Human Resources Managers vs. Financial Managers pay differ by state?
The gap varies significantly by state. In District of Columbia, Human Resources Managerss earn $184,350 vs. $188,880 for Financial Managerss. See the state comparison table on this page for the full picture.