Skip to content
AffordMap
Salary comparison

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists vs. Licensed Practical and Licensed Vocational Nurses: Who Earns More?

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologistss out-earn Licensed Practical and Licensed Vocational Nursess by $31K a year at the national median, per BLS OEWS May 2025. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologistss land at $95,480 and Licensed Practical and Licensed Vocational Nursess at $64,400. The education gap is real: magnetic resonance imaging technologist programs typically require bachelor's degree, while licensed practical and licensed vocational nurse programs require postsecondary nondegree award. Top-paying state for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologistss is District of Columbia ($128,710); for Licensed Practical and Licensed Vocational Nursess it's Washington ($83,150).

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists
Licensed Practical and Licensed Vocational Nurses
Median salary
$95,480
$64,400
Hourly rate
$45.91/hr
$30.96/hr
Entry level (10th %)
$68,890
$49,740
Senior level (90th %)
$127,670
$83,440
Education required
Bachelor's degree
Postsecondary nondegree award
U.S. employment
43,390
648,410
Job growth (10-year)
N/A
N/A
Category
Healthcare
Healthcare
Top-paying state
District of Columbia
Washington

Pay by state

States where both occupations have BLS data, sorted by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists median pay.

State
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists
Licensed Practical and Licensed Vocational Nurses
District of Columbia
$128,710
$75,740
California
$124,000
$79,750
Washington
$122,750
$83,150
Oregon
$121,920
$80,470
Alaska
$120,610
$80,800
Massachusetts
$110,600
$80,220
Connecticut
$106,330
$73,690
New Hampshire
$105,420
$77,110
Colorado
$105,380
$73,880
Maryland
$105,230
$74,660
Rhode Island
$105,060
$80,090
New Jersey
$103,930
$75,160
Arizona
$100,600
$77,070
Nevada
$98,260
$76,160
Illinois
$95,380
$75,000

Source: BLS OEWS May 2025. Highlighted value is higher in each row.

Common questions

Who earns more, Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologistss or Licensed Practical and Licensed Vocational Nursess?

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologistss earn more nationally. The median is $95,480 for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologistss versus $64,400 for Licensed Practical and Licensed Vocational Nursess, a difference of $31K. Per BLS OEWS May 2025.

Which has better job growth, Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists or Licensed Practical and Licensed Vocational Nurses?

BLS Employment Projections data is not available for one or both occupations. Check the individual career pages for current outlook figures.

Which requires more education, Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists or Licensed Practical and Licensed Vocational Nurses?

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists typically requires bachelor's degree. Licensed Practical and Licensed Vocational Nurses requires postsecondary nondegree award. Education requirements vary by employer and state licensing board.

Where do Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologistss get paid the most?

District of Columbia is the top-paying state for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologistss at $128,710/year, per BLS OEWS May 2025. Major metro areas within that state typically pay even more than the state average.

How does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists vs. Licensed Practical and Licensed Vocational Nurses pay differ by state?

The gap varies significantly by state. In District of Columbia, Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologistss earn $128,710 vs. $75,740 for Licensed Practical and Licensed Vocational Nursess. See the state comparison table on this page for the full picture.

Full Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists salary breakdownView →Full Licensed Practical and Licensed Vocational Nurses salary breakdownView →Best cities for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologistss by take-home payExplore →Best cities for Licensed Practical and Licensed Vocational Nursess by take-home payExplore →How to become a magnetic resonance imaging technologistsGuide →How to become a licensed practical and licensed vocational nursesGuide →